Workshop report: the effects of psychological variables on the progression of HIV-1 disease

KL Kopnisky, DM Stoff, DM Rausch - Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2004 - Elsevier
KL Kopnisky, DM Stoff, DM Rausch
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2004Elsevier
The reciprocal interactions between the neuroendocrine, immune, and autonomic nervous
systems are complicated, yet worthy of examination. A body of literature suggests that
psychological factors such as stress, or psychiatric conditions such as major depression,
may influence the immune system thereby altering host susceptibility to viral, or other types
of infection. Alternately, in an attempt to limit infection and replication, the anti-viral host
response, via innate and acquired immunity and subsequent release of pro-inflammatory …
The reciprocal interactions between the neuroendocrine, immune, and autonomic nervous systems are complicated, yet worthy of examination. A body of literature suggests that psychological factors such as stress, or psychiatric conditions such as major depression, may influence the immune system thereby altering host susceptibility to viral, or other types of infection. Alternately, in an attempt to limit infection and replication, the anti-viral host response, via innate and acquired immunity and subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and additional anti-viral mediators, may affect mood, cognition emotion, and possibly precipitate a psychiatric disorder. In order to address what is known regarding neuroendocrine–immune interactions in the context of HIV infection, the Center for Mental Health Research on AIDS convened a panel of scientists from diverse areas of expertise. Their primary charge was to examine whether stress-induced activation of the neuroendocrine system affects the immune system in a manner that negatively influences HIV disease progression, and whether HIV infection influences the central nervous system and behavior. The ensuing report summarizes their deliberations as they discussed the current body of information and identified outstanding critical questions in the areas of research. The group consensus was that the biological mediators of psychological status can play an important role in mediating HIV disease progression, particularly in subgroups of vulnerable patients; furthermore, they identified candidate biological mediators and mechanisms of disease progression. The Workgroup outlined the inherent challenges and limitations of such research and provided recommendations as to the future directions of research utilizing human, animal, and in vitro models of HIV-1 infection and stress.
Elsevier