The Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2α N-Terminal and C-Terminal Transactivation Domains Cooperate To Promote Renal Tumorigenesis In Vivo

Q Yan, S Bartz, M Mao, L Li… - Molecular and cellular …, 2007 - Taylor & Francis
Q Yan, S Bartz, M Mao, L Li, WG Kaelin Jr
Molecular and cellular biology, 2007Taylor & Francis
Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a heterodimeric transcription factor, consisting of an alpha
subunit and a beta subunit, that controls cellular responses to hypoxia. HIF α contains two
transcriptional activation domains called the N-terminal transactivation domain (NTAD) and
the C-terminal transactivation domain (CTAD). HIF α is destabilized by prolyl hydroxylation
catalyzed by EglN family members. In addition, CTAD function is inhibited by asparagine
hydroxylation catalyzed by FIH1. Both hydroxylation reactions are linked to oxygen …
Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a heterodimeric transcription factor, consisting of an alpha subunit and a beta subunit, that controls cellular responses to hypoxia. HIFα contains two transcriptional activation domains called the N-terminal transactivation domain (NTAD) and the C-terminal transactivation domain (CTAD). HIFα is destabilized by prolyl hydroxylation catalyzed by EglN family members. In addition, CTAD function is inhibited by asparagine hydroxylation catalyzed by FIH1. Both hydroxylation reactions are linked to oxygen availability. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) is frequently mutated in kidney cancer and is part of the ubiquitin ligase complex that targets prolyl hydroxylated HIFα for destruction. Recent studies suggest that HIF2α plays an especially important role in promoting tumor formation by pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells among the three HIFα paralogs. Here we dissected the relative contribution of the two HIF2α transactivation domains to hypoxic gene activation and renal carcinogenesis and investigated the regulation of the HIF2α CTAD by FIH1. We found that the HIF2α NTAD is capable of activating both artificial and naturally occurring HIF-responsive promoters in the absence of the CTAD. Moreover, we found that the HIF2α CTAD, in contrast to the HIF1α CTAD, is relatively resistant to the inhibitory effects of FIH1 under normoxic conditions and that, perhaps as a result, both the NTAD and CTAD cooperate to promote renal carcinogenesis in vivo.
Taylor & Francis Online